LLM Guardrails Tools 2026
LLM Guardrails sit between your AI applications and the model, inspecting prompts and responses in real time to block prompt injection, jailbreaks, sensitive data leakage, and unsafe or off-policy outputs. Treat them as a firewall for the LLM layer: they enforce input and output policy at runtime, where your existing AppSec controls have no visibility. Security leaders adopting this category are usually trying to ship GenAI features and agents without exposing prompts, training data, or downstream systems to abuse. The options here range from open-source filtering libraries you self-host to managed inline proxies that sit directly in the request path.
We cover 80 LLM Guardrails tools, 2 free and 78 commercial.
Accuracy and depth improve over time. Last reviewed Aug 2026. Is something off? Reach out.
FEATURED
Top LLM Guardrails Tools
USE CASES
Firewall for LLM systems preventing prompt injection, data leaks & jailbreaks
Runtime security platform for GenAI apps with threat detection & guardrails
Firewall protecting LLMs from prompt attacks, data leaks, and harmful outputs
Runtime security for AI models, agents, and data with guardrails and compliance
Platform securing AI models at inference with red-teaming, defense & monitoring
LLM Guard is a security toolkit that enhances the safety and security of interactions with Large Language Models (LLMs) by providing features like sanitization, harmful language detection, data leakage prevention, and resistance against prompt injection attacks.
AI security platform for testing, defending, and monitoring GenAI apps & agents
How to choose LLM Guardrails tools
- Pin down where inspection happens and what latency it adds. An inline proxy on the critical request path needs to add single-digit milliseconds, not seconds, or product teams will route around it.
- Confirm it covers both input and output. Input-only filtering misses data leakage and harmful generations; you want injection and jailbreak detection on prompts plus PII, secret, and policy checks on responses.
- Nail down data handling. If prompts and completions contain regulated data, know whether the tool processes traffic in your environment or sends it to a vendor, and whether that fits your compliance posture.
- Look for agent and tool-call awareness, not just chat filtering. As you move to agents, the real risk is unsafe actions and indirect injection through retrieved content, so the guardrail has to reason about tool invocations.
- Evaluate policy flexibility and false-positive rate on your own traffic. Generic safety classifiers block legitimate requests in specialized domains; you need custom rules and tunable thresholds.
- Assess observability and audit trails. You will need logs of what was blocked and why, both for incident response and to prove enforcement to auditors and risk committees.
LLM Guardrails Tools FAQ
Common questions about LLM Guardrails tools, selection guides, pricing, and comparisons.
LLM guardrails are runtime controls that inspect every prompt going into a model and every response coming out, enforcing policy at the moment of inference. They detect and block prompt injection, jailbreak attempts, leakage of PII or secrets, toxic or off-topic outputs, and unsafe tool calls by agents. Unlike model-level safety tuning, guardrails are external, configurable, and sit in your application's request path so you control the rules.
They operate at different layers. AI-SPM is discovery and governance: it inventories your models, datasets, and AI pipelines, scores their posture, and flags misconfigurations and shadow AI. Guardrails are inline runtime enforcement that inspects live traffic to and from the model. SPM tells you what AI you have and whether it is configured safely; guardrails actively block malicious or non-compliant requests as they happen. Mature programs run both.
No tool stops it completely, and any vendor claiming otherwise is overselling. Prompt injection, especially indirect injection through retrieved documents or tool output, remains an open research problem. Good guardrails meaningfully reduce risk through input classification, output filtering, and policy enforcement, but they are one layer of defense in depth. Pair them with least-privilege tool access, human approval for high-risk actions, and strict separation of trusted instructions from untrusted data.
Open-source libraries are a strong starting point and give you full control over rules and where data lives, which matters when prompts carry sensitive content. The tradeoff is that you own the detection logic, latency tuning, threat-model updates, and scaling. Commercial inline platforms add managed detection models, analytics, multi-tenant policy management, and SLAs. Teams often prototype on open source and move to a commercial layer once GenAI features carry real production and compliance load.
