Loading...
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) converges networking and security into a single cloud-delivered service, so traffic from any user, site, or device gets routed and inspected at a nearby edge point instead of being backhauled to a corporate data center. The tools here combine SD-WAN with security service edge functions like SWG, CASB, ZTNA, and FWaaS under one policy and one console. It exists because the hub-and-spoke model broke once applications moved to SaaS and the workforce stopped sitting behind the firewall. For CISOs, SASE is the bet that you can collapse a pile of point products and MPLS contracts into one identity-driven platform without losing visibility on the way.
We cover 30 Secure Access Service Edge tools, 0 free and 30 commercial.
Accuracy and depth improve over time. Last reviewed Jul 2026. Is something off? Reach out.
Cloud-delivered SASE combining SSE and SD-WAN for hybrid workforce access
Cloud-native SASE platform converging SD-WAN, network, and SSE security functions
AI-powered enterprise networking platform with integrated security and management
Enterprise workspace platform providing secure access and DaaS solutions
Cloud-delivered SASE solution securing users, apps, devices, and data everywhere
AI-powered SASE platform for securing hybrid workforce and branch networks
Common questions about Secure Access Service Edge tools, selection guides, pricing, and comparisons.
SASE is an architecture that delivers networking and security together as a cloud service from points of presence close to your users. It pairs SD-WAN for connectivity with security service edge functions such as secure web gateway, CASB, zero trust network access, and firewall-as-a-service. Policy follows identity rather than network location, so the same rules apply whether someone connects from an office, home, or a coffee shop.
Security service edge (SSE) is the security half of SASE: SWG, CASB, ZTNA, and FWaaS delivered from the cloud. SASE adds the networking half, primarily SD-WAN, so connectivity and security ship as one platform. If you only need to secure access to web, SaaS, and private apps and you are keeping your existing WAN, SSE may be enough. SASE makes sense when you also want to converge branch networking.
Start with your actual traffic patterns and pain points. A heavy branch and MPLS footprint pushes you toward strong SD-WAN; a remote-first workforce on SaaS leans toward SSE depth. Check that the security stack is genuinely single-vendor and single-console rather than acquisitions stitched together. Then test PoP coverage near your users, identity provider integration, and whether one policy engine truly governs every function.
Single-vendor SASE gives you one policy model, one data plane, and one support contact, which usually means simpler operations and more consistent inspection. The tradeoff is depth: a focused CASB or ZTNA specialist may outperform a converged suite on its specific function. Many CISOs accept slightly less depth for fewer integration seams, but if one capability is mission critical, validate it directly before committing.
For most remote access use cases, the ZTNA component is designed to retire legacy VPN by granting per-application access based on identity and device posture instead of dropping users onto the network. Branch firewalls and web gateways can be consolidated into the FWaaS and SWG functions delivered at the edge. Plan a phased cutover rather than a hard switch, since you will run both models in parallel during migration.