HoneyMalt vs MokN Bait: 2026 Comparison
HoneyMalt is a free honeypots & deception tool. MokN Bait is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by MokN. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Threat intelligence analysts who already use Maltego and deploy honeypots will find value in HoneyMalt's ability to visualize attack patterns directly from honeypot telemetry without manual data export workflows. The transform pack connects to MySQL honeypot databases and surfaces relationship graphs that accelerate pivot analysis during incident response. Skip this if you need a standalone honeypot management platform or lack existing Maltego licenses; HoneyMalt is purpose-built for teams who've already committed to Maltego's workflow and want to reduce the friction between honeypot data collection and threat modeling.
Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in credential stuffing and password spray attacks need MokN Bait because it stops attackers at the moment they try stolen passwords, not weeks later in logs. Cloud deployment means no infrastructure work, and the zero false positive guarantee matters when your SOC is already understaffed; you get signal instead of noise. Skip this if your threat model is primarily external perimeter attacks rather than post-breach lateral movement, or if your team lacks basic credential hygiene to make decoy baits credible.
