Syrup vs SSHoney: 2026 Comparison
Syrup is a free honeypots & deception tool. SSHoney is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running exposed SSH infrastructure who want to see what attackers actually do once they breach credentials will find Syrup's session recording and fake shell interactions invaluable for threat intelligence; the Go implementation keeps deployment lightweight on commodity hardware. Its 99 GitHub stars and free pricing make it a low-friction addition to existing detection workflows, though it prioritizes observation over blocking, so pair it with network controls if you're treating SSH as a critical perimeter. Skip Syrup if you need production-grade SSH access management or NIST Respond capabilities; it's purely about understanding attacker behavior after the fact.
Security teams running exposed SSH services who want free, lightweight SSH connection logging should deploy SSHoney. It requires minimal setup, runs as a standalone binary, and captures authentication attempts without agent overhead. Skip this if you need centralized threat intelligence, automated response, or integration with existing SIEM tooling; SSHoney logs locally and offers no native connectors, so you're building glue code yourself.
