SSRFmap vs ffuf: 2026 Comparison
SSRFmap is a free penetration testing tool. ffuf is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and security engineers running routine infrastructure assessments will get the most from SSRFmap because it automates SSRF discovery against internal services without manual payload crafting, cutting reconnaissance time from hours to minutes. The 3,320 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal real adoption among practitioners who've validated its fuzzing patterns against live cloud and on-prem backends. Skip this tool if your team needs a polished UI or integration with commercial pentest platforms; SSRFmap is CLI-driven and assumes comfort with Python-based tooling and result interpretation.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to enumerate web application endpoints fast should reach for ffuf; it outpaces traditional fuzzers like wfuzz by 10-50x on identical wordlists because it's written in Go and handles concurrency natively. The 14,700+ GitHub stars reflect real adoption in offensive security workflows, particularly for API discovery and parameter brute-forcing where speed determines whether you finish reconnaissance in hours or days. Skip ffuf if your team needs a GUI, authentication state management across fuzzing jobs, or tight integration with a commercial vulnerability management platform; it's command-line only and requires scripting to orchestrate complex attack chains.
