SBS CyberSecurity Security Awareness Training vs Proofpoint Security Awareness Training: 2026 Comparison

SBS CyberSecurity Security Awareness Training

Startups and mid-market firms without dedicated security training infrastructure should pick SBS CyberSecurity Security Awareness Training for its role-based customization across employees, executives, and boards, which actually gets buy-in from non-technical leadership instead of forcing one generic course on everyone. The vendor covers NIST CSF 2.0 PR.AT and offers both live and recorded delivery, so you're not locked into one format as your team scales. Skip this if you need integrated phishing simulation tied to training outcomes; SBS teaches awareness separately from attack-and-measure programs, which means two vendors instead of one.

Proofpoint Security Awareness Training

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need measurable behavior change, not just compliance checkboxes, should evaluate Proofpoint Security Awareness Training for its risk-based learning automation that tailors content to employee roles and past mistakes. The platform directly addresses NIST CSF 2.0's Awareness and Training function and has matured enough across 5,000-person customer bases to show real shifts in click rates and reported phishing attempts. Skip this if your org primarily needs one-off annual training videos or lacks the infrastructure to track and act on behavioral metrics; Proofpoint demands ongoing engagement data to justify its cost.