qsfuzz vs ffuf: 2026 Comparison
qsfuzz is a free penetration testing tool. ffuf is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Web app pentesters on tight budgets will find qsfuzz's rule-based approach cuts through parameter fuzzing without the overhead of commercial tools; at free and 302 GitHub stars, it's already in use where practitioners need fast, focused query string testing. The trade-off is real though: qsfuzz excels at fuzzing depth but won't replace a full web app scanner for coverage across headers, cookies, and request bodies, so teams needing consolidated vulnerability discovery should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to enumerate web application endpoints fast should reach for ffuf; it outpaces traditional fuzzers like wfuzz by 10-50x on identical wordlists because it's written in Go and handles concurrency natively. The 14,700+ GitHub stars reflect real adoption in offensive security workflows, particularly for API discovery and parameter brute-forcing where speed determines whether you finish reconnaissance in hours or days. Skip ffuf if your team needs a GUI, authentication state management across fuzzing jobs, or tight integration with a commercial vulnerability management platform; it's command-line only and requires scripting to orchestrate complex attack chains.
