QRadio vs Lunar: 2026 Comparison
QRadio is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Threat intelligence teams at smaller organizations or SOCs with fragmented intel sources should evaluate QRadio if you need rapid consolidation without vendor lock-in; the free pricing and 98 GitHub stars suggest active community maintenance and transparency about what you're actually getting. The framework approach means you're building on an open foundation rather than licensing a black box, which matters when your analysts need to customize feeds or audit logic. Skip this if your organization requires vendor SLAs, managed feeds, or hand-holding through integration; QRadio prioritizes operator flexibility over turnkey ease.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
