Liffy vs xssor2: 2026 Comparison
Liffy is a free penetration testing tool. xssor2 is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers running manual assessments against legacy applications will find Liffy invaluable for LFI exploitation; it handles filter bypass and log poisoning chains that require tedious manual crafting. The 884 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect adoption among red teams who need a focused, scriptable tool rather than bloated frameworks. Skip this if you're looking for a GUI-driven scanner or need coverage beyond file inclusion vulnerabilities; Liffy is deliberately narrow and expects operator skill.
Penetration testers validating XSS payloads across web applications will move faster with xssor2 than building custom exploitation scripts; its payload generation and reflection detection are genuinely faster than manual testing loops. The 2,185 GitHub stars signal real adoption in the pentesting community, and the free pricing removes budget friction for red teams already stretched thin. Skip this if you need automated, continuous scanning of production apps; xssor2 is a manual testing accelerator, not a web application firewall or SAST replacement.
