Aikido Attack vs xssor2: 2026 Comparison
Aikido Attack is a commercial penetration testing tool by Aikido Security. xssor2 is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs that need pen testing but lack in-house expertise will move fastest with Aikido Attack; same-day reports and automated remediation pull requests compress what normally takes weeks into hours. The platform covers OWASP Top 10 and business logic flaws across whitebox, greybox, and blackbox modes with 90-day free re-testing, removing the friction of scheduling and paying for repeat assessments. Skip this if your team needs deep manual testing for complex threat modeling or custom attack scenarios; the AI agents excel at finding known vulnerability classes, not novel ones.
Penetration testers validating XSS payloads across web applications will move faster with xssor2 than building custom exploitation scripts; its payload generation and reflection detection are genuinely faster than manual testing loops. The 2,185 GitHub stars signal real adoption in the pentesting community, and the free pricing removes budget friction for red teams already stretched thin. Skip this if you need automated, continuous scanning of production apps; xssor2 is a manual testing accelerator, not a web application firewall or SAST replacement.
