Katana vs WebDAV Covert Channel: 2026 Comparison
Katana is a free offensive security tool. WebDAV Covert Channel is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running reconnaissance workflows or building custom crawling pipelines will get the most from Katana; the 14K GitHub stars reflect genuine adoption by practitioners who need fine-grained control over spidering logic rather than point-and-click scanners. The framework approach means you're writing code to extract what matters to your target scope, which beats generic crawlers for complex authentication flows or JavaScript-heavy applications. Skip this if your team lacks engineering resources or needs a managed SaaS interface; Katana requires Python knowledge and infrastructure to operationalize.
Red team operators and penetration testers validating WebDAV weaknesses in their own infrastructure will find WebDAV Covert Channel valuable for demonstrating C2 evasion tactics that slip past signature-based detection. The tool's use of native WebDAV protocol features means it generates legitimate-looking traffic patterns that most organizations haven't specifically instrumented to catch, making it effective for stress-testing detection gaps in NIST Detect capabilities. Skip this if your goal is operational C2 for live engagements; it's a lab tool for controlled assessment, not a field weapon, and requires explicit network access to WebDAV services most enterprises have already disabled.
