Android port of Radamsa vs Katana: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Katana is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Security teams running reconnaissance workflows or building custom crawling pipelines will get the most from Katana; the 14K GitHub stars reflect genuine adoption by practitioners who need fine-grained control over spidering logic rather than point-and-click scanners. The framework approach means you're writing code to extract what matters to your target scope, which beats generic crawlers for complex authentication flows or JavaScript-heavy applications. Skip this if your team lacks engineering resources or needs a managed SaaS interface; Katana requires Python knowledge and infrastructure to operationalize.
