Kako vs Acalvio ShadowPlex: 2026 Comparison
Kako is a free honeypots & deception tool. Acalvio ShadowPlex is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by Acalvio Technologies. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams building embedded device security programs on AWS will find Kako's honeypot templates worth testing because they're purpose-built for the IoT attack surface rather than generic network deception. The free pricing and JSON output integration mean you can spin up realistic device traps without procurement friction. Skip this if you need honeypots that also handle cloud infrastructure or require vendor support; Kako's 28 GitHub stars and active-project status suggest community maintenance rather than backed commercial infrastructure.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams with exposed APIs, web applications, or IoT infrastructure should use ShadowPlex to catch reconnaissance and credential attacks before they reach production systems. The platform's external-facing decoys generate high-fidelity threat intelligence in STIX format while monitoring for password spraying and brute-force attempts, directly addressing ID.RA and DE.CM in NIST CSF 2.0. Skip this if your attack surface is entirely internal or if you need deep visibility into post-breach lateral movement; ShadowPlex is optimized for early detection at the perimeter, not incident response.
