Honeygrove vs Cybermerc Aushield Detect: 2026 Comparison
Honeygrove is a free honeypots & deception tool. Cybermerc Aushield Detect is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by Cybermerc. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams defending industrial control systems or running lab environments where you need fast honeypot deployment will find Honeygrove's native Siemens S7 protocol support genuinely useful; most open-source honeypots treat ICS as an afterthought. The modular Python architecture means you can spin up a functional trap in hours rather than weeks, and the 20 GitHub stars reflect a small but active maintainer base. Skip this if you need commercial support, pre-built integrations with your SIEM, or honeypots spanning multiple protocols; Honeygrove is purpose-built for depth in one protocol, not breadth across many.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams hunting advanced adversaries will value Cybermerc Aushield Detect for its ability to turn deception into attribution; you don't just detect threats, you collect TTP data that connects incidents to specific threat actors and disrupts their operations in real time. The platform's hybrid deployment model and industry-specific customization options mean you're not forcing a generic honeypot strategy across healthcare and finance operations that operate fundamentally differently. Skip this if your team lacks the analyst bandwidth to manage active adversary engagement; Aushield Detect demands hands-on threat intelligence work, not a set-and-forget sensor.
