NIKSUN® NikOS Everest™ vs PacketQ: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
NIKSUN® NikOS Everest™ is a commercial digital forensics and incident response tool by NIKSUN. PacketQ is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Enterprise security teams investigating advanced breaches need NikOS Everest for its packet-level forensics depth; most tools give you alerts, this one gives you the actual network conversation that proves what happened. Query response time improved 4X in version 5.1, and the platform maps cleanly to NIST DE.CM and DE.AE for detection and analysis, though it prioritizes forensic investigation over automated response actions. Mid-market buyers should verify their network capture and storage budget before committing; this is a specialist tool for organizations with the ops maturity to run on-premises packet infrastructure, not a replacement for broader network monitoring.
Incident response teams who need to hunt through packet captures without waiting for GUI tools or commercial PCAP analyzers should reach for PacketQ. The SQL-query approach lets analysts filter and correlate network artifacts in seconds what would take minutes in traditional packet inspection tools, and it's genuinely free with no licensing friction. Skip this if your team lacks command-line fluency or needs graphical packet visualization; PacketQ solves the analyst's problem, not the manager's dashboard problem.
