InlineWhispers vs WebDAV Covert Channel: 2026 Comparison
InlineWhispers is a free offensive security tool. WebDAV Covert Channel is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and Cobalt Strike operators who need to evade EDR syscall hooking will find InlineWhispers essential for maintaining beacon stability under active monitoring. The tool directly addresses the detection vector most modern EDRs target first,userland API interception,by forcing direct system calls through BOF integration, which shifts the detection burden to kernel-mode monitoring that fewer organizations have tuned. With 321 GitHub stars from a specialized audience and a free model with no licensing friction, adoption is straightforward for teams already committed to Beacon workflows. This isn't for operators still learning offensive fundamentals or those prioritizing payload portability over evasion depth; InlineWhispers assumes competency with BOF development and syscall mechanics.
Red team operators and penetration testers validating WebDAV weaknesses in their own infrastructure will find WebDAV Covert Channel valuable for demonstrating C2 evasion tactics that slip past signature-based detection. The tool's use of native WebDAV protocol features means it generates legitimate-looking traffic patterns that most organizations haven't specifically instrumented to catch, making it effective for stress-testing detection gaps in NIST Detect capabilities. Skip this if your goal is operational C2 for live engagements; it's a lab tool for controlled assessment, not a field weapon, and requires explicit network access to WebDAV services most enterprises have already disabled.
