racepwn vs OneGadget: 2026 Comparison
racepwn is a free penetration testing tool. OneGadget is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers validating authorization logic across distributed systems need racepwn for one reason: it automates the tedious work of sending concurrent requests at microsecond precision to expose race conditions that sequential testing misses. The framework's free availability and active GitHub community (272 stars) means your team pays zero licensing friction while borrowing battle-tested timing attack patterns. Skip this if your scope is limited to single-threaded applications or you need a guided UI; racepwn demands fluency with request crafting and result analysis, which is why it lives in the hands-on penetration toolkit rather than the compliance scanning lane.
racepwn
A framework for testing and exploiting race condition vulnerabilities through concurrent request analysis and timing attack automation.
OneGadget
OneGadget is a CTF-focused tool that uses symbolic execution to find RCE gadgets in binaries that can execute shell commands through execve('/bin/sh', NULL, NULL).
Side-by-Side Comparison
NIST CSF 2.0 Mapping
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Need help choosing?
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
