Tstat vs Nubeva SKI: 2026 Comparison
Tstat is a free network detection and response tool. Nubeva SKI is a commercial network detection and response tool by nubeva technologies. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best network detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Network teams without budget for commercial NDR tools should start with Tstat to establish baseline traffic visibility before investing in paid platforms. It performs passive network snniffer analysis at wire speed with zero agents, meaning you get immediate insight into east-west flows and protocol anomalies on any network segment. Skip this if you need behavioral baselining or automated response; Tstat is manual analysis only, and you'll outgrow it once your team scales beyond a handful of analysts reviewing packet captures.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to inspect encrypted traffic without touching application code will find Nubeva SKI's memory-based session key extraction valuable, particularly for threat hunting in hybrid environments where traditional decryption approaches create operational friction. The read-only sensor architecture and support for multiple deployment formats, including containers and C libraries, means you can inject this into running processes without recompilation or downtime. This tool prioritizes detection over prevention; if your team expects it to block threats in real time, you'll be disappointed, and very small organizations will struggle to justify the operational overhead of managing key infrastructure.
