Cyber adAPT Secure Device Management vs Fleet: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cyber adAPT Secure Device Management is a commercial mobile device management tool by Cyber adAPT. Fleet is a free mobile device management tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best mobile device management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Cyber adAPT Secure Device Management
Mid-market and SMB teams managing mixed device fleets across remote and office work will get the most from Cyber adAPT Secure Device Management because its certificate-based access control prevents lateral movement without requiring complex PKI infrastructure upfront. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and PR.DS through enforced device compliance policies paired with 256-bit IPSec VPN, giving you network-level visibility that traditional MDM vendors bolt on as an afterthought. Skip this if you need deep endpoint detection and response or forensic capabilities; Cyber adAPT prioritizes access control and data leakage prevention over post-breach investigation.
IT teams managing heterogeneous fleets of 500+ macOS and Linux endpoints will get the most from Fleet because it actually scales without per-seat licensing costs. The open-source model and 6,144 GitHub stars signal a real community maintaining this, not abandonware; you can read the code and fork it if the maintainers ghost you. Skip this if you need Windows-first management or mobile device support, or if your security org demands a single vendor handling both endpoint detection and vulnerability scanning under one contract.
