Black Duck Seeker IAST vs Contrast ContrastProtect: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Black Duck Seeker IAST

Development teams shipping microservices and APIs into CI/CD pipelines need active verification that catches real vulnerabilities before production, and Black Duck Seeker IAST does this by instrumenting running applications to validate findings rather than relying on static analysis guesses. Its API discovery across REST, SOAP, and GraphQL plus gRPC support for microservices means you're actually testing what you built, not what a scanner thinks exists. Skip this if your stack is predominantly monolithic Java or .NET with slow release cycles; the tool's value compounds in high-velocity, containerized deployments where false positives crater developer trust.

Contrast ContrastProtect

Development teams shipping APIs and microservices need ContrastProtect's runtime blocking because attacks get stopped at execution, not logged days later in a SIEM. The product embeds instrumentation directly in application code and delivers line-of-code visibility on active exploits, which means your incident response team actually knows what to fix instead of debating findings in a backlog. Skip this if your priority is vulnerability scanning before production; ContrastProtect assumes you need protection running live against zero-days and known exploits that your WAF already missed.