Akto Secure AI Usage vs QuilrAI: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Akto Secure AI Usage is a commercial ai threat detection tool by Akto. QuilrAI is a commercial ai threat detection tool by Quilr. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best ai threat detection fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling employee AI tool adoption will get the most from Akto Secure AI Usage because it actually catches agentic assets and MCP servers running on endpoints, not just ChatGPT in a browser tab. The endpoint agent monitors across 80+ connectors with real-time interception of unsafe interactions, covering the DE.CM and DE.AE functions where most AI monitoring solutions stop at shallow SaaS discovery. Skip this if you're looking for a data loss prevention tool that happens to watch AI; Akto is built around the assumption that your AI risk sits at the endpoint, and that architectural choice limits its value for teams primarily concerned with SaaS AI compliance.
Security teams protecting AI agents and LLM-integrated applications need QuilrAI because it's built to detect and block malicious interactions at the point where traditional security tooling goes blind. The tool maps to three NIST CSF 2.0 functions (Data Security, Continuous Monitoring, and Awareness), with particular strength in autonomous decision-making oversight that human-first tools simply don't address. Skip this if your organization runs primarily legacy applications without agentic systems; QuilrAI solves a category problem that doesn't exist in your environment yet.
