Accops Work From Anywhere vs Cato Networks ZTNA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Accops Work From Anywhere

Mid-market and enterprise teams needing a single control point for remote access across BYOD, VDI, and legacy systems should look at Accops Work From Anywhere; the unified application portal eliminates the friction of managing separate gateways for web, SaaS, virtual, and on-prem apps. Its alignment with NIST PR.AA and PR.PS,identity management tied directly to platform security controls,means you're not bolting authentication onto a permissive network layer. Skip this if your priority is detection and response; Accops is access architecture, not threat hunting, and it assumes you've already sorted your identity posture upstream.

Cato Networks ZTNA

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy VPN with zero trust will prefer Cato Networks ZTNA for its cloud-native architecture that eliminates the need to manage on-premises infrastructure while enforcing identity-based access across hybrid IT. The platform covers both NIST PR.AA (identity and access control) and PR.IR (infrastructure resilience), meaning you get access policy enforcement without sacrificing visibility into whether your security perimeter actually holds under load. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on-premises and needs deep microsegmentation of internal networks; Cato shines at securing remote access to distributed resources, not re-architecting the datacenter.