Virtru Data Protection Gateway vs Virtru Secure Share: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Virtru Data Protection Gateway

Security teams in mid-market and enterprise organizations that need encryption enforced automatically across email and SaaS applications will get the most from Virtru Data Protection Gateway, particularly if your compliance burden includes HIPAA or GDPR and you can't afford manual encryption workflows. The platform covers PR.DS (data security) and ID.RA (risk assessment) under NIST CSF 2.0, with granular access controls and revocation capabilities that actually work post-send. Skip this if your primary concern is detecting exfiltration attempts in real time; Virtru prioritizes encryption and access control over behavioral anomaly detection.

Virtru Secure Share

Security teams protecting sensitive files across Microsoft and Google ecosystems should pick Virtru Secure Share for its granular revocation capability, which actually lets you pull back access after a file leaves your control,a feature most file-sharing tools promise but few execute reliably. The tool covers three of four NIST CSF 2.0 governance pillars (data security, access control, and monitoring), with FIPS 140-2 validated encryption for regulated environments. Skip this if your priority is preventing exfiltration at the network layer rather than securing files after they've already been shared; Virtru assumes the file is already moving and focuses on damage containment instead.