Cohesity Threat Protection vs NinjaOne Backup: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cohesity Threat Protection

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing ransomware risk across hybrid infrastructure should evaluate Cohesity Threat Protection for one reason: it finds clean data in backups faster than manual recovery workflows, which directly shortens incident recovery windows. The AI-powered threat detection scores strongly on NIST RS.MI (incident mitigation) by automating the identification of uninfected snapshots at scale, cutting the guess work out of which backups are safe to restore from. Skip this if your organization has already standardized on a separate backup vendor with embedded threat scanning; Cohesity's strength is concentrated in detection and recovery, not broad backup infrastructure replacement.

NinjaOne Backup

SMB and mid-market IT teams drowning in point backup tools will appreciate NinjaOne Backup's ability to manage endpoints, servers, and SaaS platforms from a single console without the complexity of agent sprawl. The chainless image backup engine cuts recovery time materially compared to traditional snapshot-based approaches, and hybrid deployment means you're not locked into cloud-only economics. Skip this if your organization needs specialized ransomware backup isolation or immutable vault architecture; NinjaOne prioritizes operational recovery speed over the hardened compliance posture that enterprise security teams increasingly demand.