Natoma MCP Gateway vs SplitSecure: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Natoma MCP Gateway: Enterprise gateway for managing AI agent access to enterprise data via MCP. built by Natoma. Core capabilities include Centralized MCP server deployment and management, Catalog of verified and monitored MCP servers, Auto-generation of MCP servers from OpenAPI specifications..

SplitSecure: Enterprise PAM platform using Shamir Secret Sharing to eliminate credential exposure. built by SplitSecure. Core capabilities include Privileged access management with no credential exposure, Passwordless authentication for legacy and modern environments, Shamir Secret Sharing-based cryptographic secret splitting..

Both serve the Privileged Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Natoma MCP Gateway differentiates with Centralized MCP server deployment and management, Catalog of verified and monitored MCP servers, Auto-generation of MCP servers from OpenAPI specifications. SplitSecure differentiates with Privileged access management with no credential exposure, Passwordless authentication for legacy and modern environments, Shamir Secret Sharing-based cryptographic secret splitting.

Natoma MCP Gateway is developed by Natoma. SplitSecure is developed by SplitSecure. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Natoma MCP Gateway and SplitSecure serve similar Privileged Access Management use cases: both are Privileged Access Management tools, both cover Authentication, Least Privilege. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.