Akeyless Secure Remote Access vs Natoma MCP Gateway: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Akeyless Secure Remote Access

Teams managing infrastructure across multiple cloud providers or hybrid environments should choose Akeyless Secure Remote Access to eliminate standing credentials entirely, replacing them with identity-driven just-in-time access tied directly to your SSO. The secretless architecture maps cleanly to NIST PR.AA controls by design, removing the attack surface that traditional PAM tools still carry. Skip this if your infrastructure is entirely on-premises and air-gapped; the cloud-native architecture assumes identity provider integration as your primary authentication mechanism.

Natoma MCP Gateway

Enterprise security teams deploying AI agents into production need Natoma MCP Gateway because it's the only gateway that treats MCP servers as a privileged access problem rather than a developer convenience. It covers the full NIST PR.AA stack,authentication, authorization, and least-privilege enforcement,while maintaining the ID.AM and DE.CM visibility that makes shadow AI discovery actually useful instead of theoretical. Skip this if your organization hasn't yet separated AI infrastructure decisions from general API management; you're not ready for the compliance and access control overhead it requires.