Akto Homegrown AI and GenAI Security vs Lunar.dev AI Gateway: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Akto Homegrown AI and GenAI Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams deploying internal generative AI applications or agent workflows should prioritize Akto Homegrown AI and GenAI Security for its focus on prompt injection and data exfiltration risks that standard API security tools miss. The platform's continuous monitoring across AI agent interactions directly addresses NIST PR.PS (platform security) and DE.CM (anomaly detection) in contexts where model abuse and prompt attacks pose material business risk. Skip this if your GenAI footprint is limited to third-party SaaS tools like ChatGPT; Akto's value concentrates on homegrown implementations where you control the deployment and risk exposure.

Lunar.dev AI Gateway

Security and platform teams managing multiple LLM providers across agents and applications need Lunar.dev AI Gateway to enforce consistent data governance before requests leave your infrastructure; the combination of prompt sanitization, fine-grained access controls with human-in-the-loop gating, and full token-level auditing directly addresses the control gap that exists between your apps and third-party LLM APIs. The free tier lets you test rate limiting and observability without commitment, which matters when LLM spend is unpredictable. Skip this if you're looking for a single unified platform covering fine-tuning, model governance, and post-response content filtering; Lunar.dev is explicitly designed for outbound traffic management and doesn't replace model evaluation or output scanning tools.