AI Gateway vs Akto Homegrown AI and GenAI Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AI Gateway

Security teams standardizing on multiple LLM providers should use AI Gateway to stop paying for redundant API calls and enforce access controls at the model consumption layer. The semantic caching and smart routing cut token spend measurably, while the granular rate limiting and consumer group-based RBAC address the access control gaps that emerge when developers bypass your approved models. Skip this if your organization runs a single LLM internally or has already baked governance into your application layer; AI Gateway solves the hub problem, not the spoke problem.

Akto Homegrown AI and GenAI Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams deploying internal generative AI applications or agent workflows should prioritize Akto Homegrown AI and GenAI Security for its focus on prompt injection and data exfiltration risks that standard API security tools miss. The platform's continuous monitoring across AI agent interactions directly addresses NIST PR.PS (platform security) and DE.CM (anomaly detection) in contexts where model abuse and prompt attacks pose material business risk. Skip this if your GenAI footprint is limited to third-party SaaS tools like ChatGPT; Akto's value concentrates on homegrown implementations where you control the deployment and risk exposure.