What features do Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs BBT.live BeTNA offer?

**Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust** differentiates with Single Packet Authorization (SPA), Multi-factor authentication and single sign-on, Continuous adaptive access control with policy engine. **BBT.live BeTNA** differentiates with Continuous user and device authentication and authorization, Dynamic access policies adjustable based on user behavior, Micro-segmentation to limit attack surface and lateral movement.

Who makes Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs BBT.live BeTNA?

**Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust** is developed by Array Networks. **BBT.live BeTNA** is developed by BBT.live (BeBroadband). Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust a good alternative to BBT.live BeTNA?

Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust and BBT.live BeTNA serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs BBT.live BeTNA (2026) | Compare Zero Trust Network Access Tools

Q: What is the difference between Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust vs BBT.live BeTNA?

**Array ZTAG Series Zero Trust**: Zero Trust Access Gateway providing identity-based, per-app access control. built by Array Networks. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Single Packet Authorization (SPA), Multi-factor authentication and single sign-on, Continuous adaptive access control with policy engine.. **BBT.live BeTNA**: ZTNA solution providing identity-based, continuous-verification network access control. built by BBT.live (BeBroadband). headquartered in Israel. Core capabilities include Continuous user and device authentication and authorization, Dynamic access policies adjustable based on user behavior, Micro-segmentation to limit attack surface and lateral movement.. Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.