What features do Common Fate vs Serval Manage Access offer?

**Common Fate** differentiates with Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level. **Serval Manage Access** differentiates with Fine-grained access policies with time limits and approval workflows, Just-in-time access request automation, SCIM and direct API provisioning.

Who makes Common Fate vs Serval Manage Access?

**Common Fate** is developed by Common Fate. **Serval Manage Access** is developed by Serval. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Common Fate a good alternative to Serval Manage Access?

Common Fate and Serval Manage Access serve similar Privileged Access Management use cases: both are Privileged Access Management tools, both cover PAM, Least Privilege, Policy. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Common Fate vs Serval Manage Access (2026) | Compare Privileged Access Management Tools

Q: What is the difference between Common Fate vs Serval Manage Access?

**Common Fate**: JIT privileged access mgmt platform for cloud-native teams on AWS & GCP. built by Common Fate. headquartered in Australia. Core capabilities include Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level.. **Serval Manage Access**: Automates just-in-time access requests with least privilege policies. built by Serval. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Fine-grained access policies with time limits and approval workflows, Just-in-time access request automation, SCIM and direct API provisioning.. Both serve the Privileged Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.