What features do Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Common Fate offer?

**Akeyless AI Agent Security** differentiates with Dynamic secrets generation with just-in-time access, Zero-knowledge cryptography using Distributed Fragments Cryptography, Ephemeral identity federation across cloud, SaaS, and on-prem. **Common Fate** differentiates with Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level.

Who makes Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Common Fate?

**Akeyless AI Agent Security** is developed by Akeyless Security. **Common Fate** is developed by Common Fate. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Akeyless AI Agent Security a good alternative to Common Fate?

Akeyless AI Agent Security and Common Fate serve similar Privileged Access Management use cases: both are Privileged Access Management tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Common Fate: 2026 Comparison Guide

Q: What is the difference between Akeyless AI Agent Security vs Common Fate?

**Akeyless AI Agent Security**: Identity provider for AI agents with secrets mgmt and access control. built by Akeyless Security. Core capabilities include Dynamic secrets generation with just-in-time access, Zero-knowledge cryptography using Distributed Fragments Cryptography, Ephemeral identity federation across cloud, SaaS, and on-prem.. **Common Fate**: JIT privileged access mgmt platform for cloud-native teams on AWS & GCP. built by Common Fate. Core capabilities include Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level.. Both serve the Privileged Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.