Akeyless Secrets Management vs Common Fate: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Akeyless Secrets Management is a commercial privileged access management tool by Akeyless Security. Common Fate is a commercial privileged access management tool by Common Fate. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best privileged access management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams managing sprawling credential inventories across cloud infrastructure will get the most from Akeyless Secrets Management because it eliminates static secrets without forcing a rip-and-replace of your existing auth stack. The platform's coverage of PR.AA and PR.DS in NIST CSF 2.0, combined with cloud-native deployment, means you're reducing standing access risk without the operational friction of traditional vault migrations. Skip this if you need strong continuous monitoring and threat detection built in; Akeyless prioritizes access control and data protection over anomaly detection, which means you'll still need a separate tool watching for compromise signals.
Mid-market and enterprise teams running AWS or GCP will find the most value in Common Fate's time-bound access model, which eliminates standing privileges without the operational friction of traditional PAM. The platform's Policy-as-Code approach and automated workflows tied to on-call systems mean your engineers spend less time in access requests and your security team audits fewer dormant accounts. Skip this if you need unified PAM across multiple cloud providers or on-premises infrastructure; Common Fate is deliberately cloud-native and won't stretch beyond AWS and GCP.
