Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Progress ShareFile is a commercial secure file sharing tool by ShareFile. Virtru Secure Share is a commercial secure file sharing tool by Virtru. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best secure file sharing fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams that treat file sharing as a compliance and audit problem, not just a convenience layer, will get the most from Progress ShareFile. Its granular permission controls, automated threat remediation, and detailed audit trails address the PR.AA and DE.CM functions that auditors actually ask about, and the AI-driven share recommendations remove the guesswork from who can access what. Skip this if your priority is replacing email encryption entirely; ShareFile bolts onto existing workflows rather than replacing them.
Security teams protecting sensitive files across Microsoft and Google ecosystems should pick Virtru Secure Share for its granular revocation capability, which actually lets you pull back access after a file leaves your control,a feature most file-sharing tools promise but few execute reliably. The tool covers three of four NIST CSF 2.0 governance pillars (data security, access control, and monitoring), with FIPS 140-2 validated encryption for regulated environments. Skip this if your priority is preventing exfiltration at the network layer rather than securing files after they've already been shared; Virtru assumes the file is already moving and focuses on damage containment instead.
Secure file sharing platform with access controls and threat detection
Cloud-native encrypted file sharing with access controls and audit capabilities
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Progress ShareFile vs Virtru Secure Share for your secure file sharing needs.
Progress ShareFile: Secure file sharing platform with access controls and threat detection. built by ShareFile. Core capabilities include Granular permissions with password protection and customized folder permissions, AI-driven share settings that recommend security configurations, Threat detection with alerts for suspicious activity..
Virtru Secure Share: Cloud-native encrypted file sharing with access controls and audit capabilities. built by Virtru. Core capabilities include End-to-end encryption for file sharing, Granular access controls with revocation capabilities, File expiration dates and watermarking..
Both serve the Secure File Sharing market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Progress ShareFile differentiates with Granular permissions with password protection and customized folder permissions, AI-driven share settings that recommend security configurations, Threat detection with alerts for suspicious activity. Virtru Secure Share differentiates with End-to-end encryption for file sharing, Granular access controls with revocation capabilities, File expiration dates and watermarking.
Progress ShareFile is developed by ShareFile. Virtru Secure Share is developed by Virtru. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Progress ShareFile and Virtru Secure Share serve similar Secure File Sharing use cases: both are Secure File Sharing tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox