Filigran eXtended Threat Management (XTM) vs Webz.io: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Filigran eXtended Threat Management (XTM)

Security operations teams managing threat intelligence at scale across multiple sources will get the most from Filigran eXtended Threat Management (XTM) because it consolidates disparate feeds and attack surface data into a single operationalized view without forcing you to build custom pipelines. The 300+ pre-built connectors and AI-powered automation mean your analysts spend time on actual threat response rather than data hygiene, and the adversarial simulation capability lets you validate whether your intel actually matters against real attack patterns. Skip this if your primary need is detection and response; XTM prioritizes intelligence organization and exposure validation over incident detection, which means you'll still need a separate SOC platform to act on what you've learned.

Webz.io

Security teams hunting stolen credentials and monitoring dark web chatter will get real value from Webz.io's APIs and Lunar platform, which surface account takeover risks faster than waiting for breach notifications. The tool covers NIST DE.CM and DE.AE continuously, actively surfacing indicators of compromise across open, deep, and dark web sources that most threat intel platforms ignore. Skip this if your priority is incident response automation or recovery workflows; Webz.io prioritizes detection and intelligence gathering over remediation.