13 Layers TOTALNETWORKPROTECTION vs Enea Signaling Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

13 Layers TOTALNETWORKPROTECTION

Mid-market and enterprise security teams needing layered network defense without complexity should evaluate 13 Layers TOTALNETWORKPROTECTION for its 13-layer architecture that actually separates threat detection from response rather than conflating them. The platform covers the full NIST Detect and Respond spectrum,continuous monitoring paired with incident analysis,which matters when your SOC is stretched thin between alert volume and root cause work. Skip this if you need tight EDR integration or cloud-native workload security; the vendor's single-person shop signals this stays network-focused.

Enea Signaling Security

Enterprise and mid-market telecom operators need Enea Signaling Security because it's the only firewall built for the signaling protocols that actually kill carrier networks: SS7, Diameter, and GTP-C. The vendor operates across five continents and offers penetration testing services specifically for signaling defenses, meaning they've seen real attacks most firewall vendors never encounter. This tool prioritizes detection and continuous monitoring over recovery workflows, so it's built for operators who can act on threats in real time but shouldn't expect automated remediation; skip this if your team needs hands-off threat response.