Cypago Agentic-AI Cyber GRC vs Drata Continuous Trust: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cypago Agentic-AI Cyber GRC

Mid-market and SMB compliance teams drowning in manual audit prep and control evidence collection should look at Cypago Agentic-AI Cyber GRC first; its ChatGRC agent actually reduces the busywork of pulling documentation across multiple frameworks instead of just promising to. The platform covers eight NIST CSF 2.0 functions with particular strength in continuous monitoring and policy enforcement, and it handles multi-framework compliance without forcing you into a single standard. Skip this if your organization needs deep forensic investigation capabilities or forensic-grade evidence chains; Cypago prioritizes compliance automation over investigation workflows.

Drata Continuous Trust

Mid-market and enterprise compliance teams buried in multi-framework audits should start with Drata Continuous Trust because its AI automation actually reduces questionnaire response time instead of just cataloging frameworks side-by-side. The platform covers 10 of 11 NIST CSF 2.0 Govern functions and excels at supply chain risk management and policy enforcement, which means less manual vendor tracking spreadsheets. Skip this if your organization needs deep detection and response capabilities; Drata prioritizes the upstream compliance work, not the downstream security operations that catch active threats.