Bane vs Chainguard: 2026 Comparison
Bane is a free container security tool. Chainguard is a commercial container security tool by Chainguard. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Teams managing Docker environments who need AppArmor policies without writing them from scratch will find Bane eliminates the manual policy creation bottleneck through automated profile generation and native Docker integration. The free pricing and 1,224 GitHub stars indicate solid adoption among practitioners who value simplicity over the policy fine-tuning that commercial tools offer. Skip this if your containers run on Kubernetes or you need cross-platform enforcement beyond AppArmor; Bane is purpose-built for Docker and Linux systems only.
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing significant container footprints should evaluate Chainguard if CVE reduction is your actual priority, not a nice-to-have. Its 1,800+ daily-rebuilt minimal images deliver 97.6% fewer CVEs than open source alternatives, backed by 7-day SLA remediation for critical issues and 400+ FIPS-validated images with STIG hardening for regulated environments. This tool is not for teams building custom applications inside containers; Chainguard's strength is supply chain hardening for organizations running standard software stacks where image provenance and attestation matter more than flexibility.
