Aikido Container Image Scanning vs Chainguard: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aikido Container Image Scanning

Teams shipping containers at scale across multiple registries need Aikido Container Image Scanning because its reachability analysis cuts false positives by actually determining which CVEs can execute in your environment, not just flagging every known vulnerability. The tool scans Kubernetes workloads directly and integrates with 12 major registries including ECR, GCR, and Artifactory, with AutoFix generating pull requests to patch real risks automatically. Skip this if your organization runs fewer than 50 container images monthly or needs runtime threat detection alongside build-time scanning; Aikido stops at the image layer and doesn't monitor what happens after deployment.

Chainguard

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing significant container footprints should evaluate Chainguard if CVE reduction is your actual priority, not a nice-to-have. Its 1,800+ daily-rebuilt minimal images deliver 97.6% fewer CVEs than open source alternatives, backed by 7-day SLA remediation for critical issues and 400+ FIPS-validated images with STIG hardening for regulated environments. This tool is not for teams building custom applications inside containers; Chainguard's strength is supply chain hardening for organizations running standard software stacks where image provenance and attestation matter more than flexibility.