Actifile Ransomware Protection vs Matisoft DLP: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Actifile Ransomware Protection

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting unstructured data from ransomware will benefit most from Actifile Ransomware Protection's transparent encryption approach, which encrypts files without performance degradation or user friction. The platform holds FIPS 140-2 validation and combines continuous sensitive data monitoring with automated file mapping, covering both the asset inventory and data security functions of NIST CSF 2.0. This is not the tool for organizations needing broader endpoint response capabilities or threat hunting; Actifile operates in a narrow lane and does it deliberately.

Matisoft DLP

SMBs and mid-market firms with on-premises infrastructure and high USB-transfer risk will find value in Matisoft DLP's hardware firewall approach to device control; the USB Vault with granular access controls and 180-day logging covers a gap that most cloud-native DLP vendors ignore. Active Directory integration and department-level file restrictions make enforcement straightforward for lean security teams. Skip this if your workforce is distributed across SaaS applications or you need cloud-native DLP that doesn't require on-premises appliances; Matisoft's strength is legacy endpoint and physical media, not lateral movement within modern stacks.