Actifile Ransomware Protection vs Fasoo Enterprise DRM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Actifile Ransomware Protection

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting unstructured data from ransomware will benefit most from Actifile Ransomware Protection's transparent encryption approach, which encrypts files without performance degradation or user friction. The platform holds FIPS 140-2 validation and combines continuous sensitive data monitoring with automated file mapping, covering both the asset inventory and data security functions of NIST CSF 2.0. This is not the tool for organizations needing broader endpoint response capabilities or threat hunting; Actifile operates in a narrow lane and does it deliberately.

Fasoo Enterprise DRM

Mid-market and enterprise teams handling sensitive IP, financial documents, or regulated content across hybrid environments should pick Fasoo Enterprise DRM for its automatic encryption that stays with files regardless of where they move, not just perimeter controls that fail once data leaves your network. The tool's strength in PR.DS (data security) and PR.AA (access control) reflects real granularity: you can restrict printing, screenshots, and editing on a per-document basis while tracking every access attempt. Skip this if your team prioritizes quick deployment over policy complexity; Fasoo requires meaningful governance overhead to avoid becoming security theater, and it won't solve for users who circumvent controls through intentional workarounds.