689Cloud SecureDrive vs Cyberhaven Data Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

689Cloud SecureDrive

Mid-market and enterprise teams shipping sensitive documents outside the firewall need 689Cloud SecureDrive for post-download revocation; it kills access to files already on someone's laptop, which standard cloud sharing cannot do. The platform maps cleanly to NIST PR.DS and PR.AA, with document-level tracking and role-based permissions that satisfy audit trails without requiring IT to babysit every share. Skip this if your primary concern is detecting exfiltration rather than preventing it; 689Cloud assumes the adversary already has the file and focuses on neutralizing its value instead.

Cyberhaven Data Protection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in shadow SaaS and generative AI sprawl will get immediate value from Cyberhaven Data Protection because it maps data movement across endpoints, cloud, and AI tools without requiring you to inventory everything first. The autonomous risk detection using Large Lineage Models reduces the manual classification burden that kills most DLP deployments, and the built-in investigation agent actually closes cases instead of just surfacing alerts. Skip this if your organization lacks the API connectivity across your SaaS stack or if you need network-based DLP that doesn't touch endpoints; Cyberhaven is endpoint and cloud-centric, leaving blind spots on the wire.