689Cloud SecureDrive vs Cyberhaven Cloud Data Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

689Cloud SecureDrive

Mid-market and enterprise teams shipping sensitive documents outside the firewall need 689Cloud SecureDrive for post-download revocation; it kills access to files already on someone's laptop, which standard cloud sharing cannot do. The platform maps cleanly to NIST PR.DS and PR.AA, with document-level tracking and role-based permissions that satisfy audit trails without requiring IT to babysit every share. Skip this if your primary concern is detecting exfiltration rather than preventing it; 689Cloud assumes the adversary already has the file and focuses on neutralizing its value instead.

Cyberhaven Cloud Data Security

Teams protecting data in end-to-end encrypted cloud apps,Slack, Teams, Google Drive,need Cyberhaven Cloud Data Security because it's one of the few DLP tools that can intercept and block data movement before encryption happens, not after. The vendor maps directly to NIST PR.DS and DE.CM, with particular strength in continuous monitoring of cross-cloud data flows that most traditional DLP platforms simply cannot see. Skip this if your organization uses mostly unencrypted SaaS or on-premises file shares; you'll overpay for capabilities you don't need.