Keepnet Phishing Simulator vs usecure uPhish: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Keepnet Phishing Simulator

Security teams at mid-market and enterprise companies will get the most from Keepnet Phishing Simulator because its 30,000+ templates and multi-channel attack surface (email, SMS, voice, QR code, MFA) let you test user behavior against the actual threats your workforce faces, not sanitized simulations. The platform's false click filtering removes noise from automated security tools, giving you real metrics on human vulnerability, and automated enrollment of clickers into targeted training directly ties simulation results to behavior change. Skip this if your priority is incident response automation or you need deep SOAR integration; Keepnet maps strongly to NIST Awareness and Training but lighter on the Detection and Response functions.

usecure uPhish

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in phishing failures will see immediate lift from usecure uPhish because AutoPhish runs campaigns on a schedule without manual intervention, then automatically funnels failed users into training. The platform covers PR.AT (Awareness and Training) and DE.AE (Adverse Event Analysis) in NIST CSF 2.0, meaning you're closing the gap between simulation and incident response in one tool. Skip this if your organization needs sophisticated post-compromise forensics; uPhish stops at behavior tracking and doesn't replace forensic or detection capabilities.