Cyberhaven Data Protection vs Teramind Data Loss Prevention: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cyberhaven Data Protection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in shadow SaaS and generative AI sprawl will get immediate value from Cyberhaven Data Protection because it maps data movement across endpoints, cloud, and AI tools without requiring you to inventory everything first. The autonomous risk detection using Large Lineage Models reduces the manual classification burden that kills most DLP deployments, and the built-in investigation agent actually closes cases instead of just surfacing alerts. Skip this if your organization lacks the API connectivity across your SaaS stack or if you need network-based DLP that doesn't touch endpoints; Cyberhaven is endpoint and cloud-centric, leaving blind spots on the wire.

Teramind Data Loss Prevention

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with insider risk as a top priority will get the most from Teramind Data Loss Prevention because its behavioral analytics engine catches exfiltration attempts that signature-based DLP misses, flagging the subtle pattern changes that precede a breach. The tool's screen recording with tamper-proof forensic logs and real-time session termination capability means you can prove what happened and stop it in the same moment, which matters when regulators ask why data left your network. Skip this if your organization needs cloud-native DLP across SaaS applications; Teramind's on-premises architecture and endpoint focus leave gaps in monitoring unmanaged shadow IT.