floss vs Revelo - Javascript Deobfuscator: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
floss is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Revelo - Javascript Deobfuscator is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Malware analysts and incident response teams doing manual binary triage will extract strings from suspicious files faster with floss than with IDA Pro's built-in string search, especially when dealing with obfuscated payloads. The tool's static analysis approach means zero runtime overhead or sandbox dependencies, and its 3,920 GitHub stars reflect consistent adoption in security operations across years. Skip floss if your team needs dynamic behavioral analysis or if you're looking for a platform that handles post-extraction correlation and threat intelligence enrichment; it does one job exceptionally well and stops there.
Revelo - Javascript Deobfuscator
Incident response teams and threat analysts who need to quickly reverse obfuscated malware payloads will find Revelo's experimental approach useful; it handles the specific problem of readable Javascript code extraction when commercial deobfuscators fail or lag behind new obfuscation techniques. Being free and open to community contribution means you get faster iteration on novel obfuscation patterns than closed-source competitors typically offer. Skip this if you need production-grade guarantees or integration with your SOAR platform; Revelo is a point tool for specialists, not a polished enterprise product.
