Antiy Labs PTA vs floss: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy Labs PTA is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. floss is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security operations teams investigating APT incidents will get the most from Antiy Labs PTA because it combines dynamic sandbox execution with static signature detection specifically tuned for advanced threat artifacts, not just commodity malware. The tool covers the full NIST Detect and Respond cycle through continuous monitoring, malware behavior analysis, and forensic-ready incident tracing, with multi-OS sandbox support including Kylin and WPS that matters if your environment isn't purely Windows. Skip this if your priority is integration breadth; Antiy Labs PTA works best as a dedicated threat analysis appliance feeding into your existing infrastructure rather than as a central correlation platform.
Malware analysts and incident response teams doing manual binary triage will extract strings from suspicious files faster with floss than with IDA Pro's built-in string search, especially when dealing with obfuscated payloads. The tool's static analysis approach means zero runtime overhead or sandbox dependencies, and its 3,920 GitHub stars reflect consistent adoption in security operations across years. Skip floss if your team needs dynamic behavioral analysis or if you're looking for a platform that handles post-extraction correlation and threat intelligence enrichment; it does one job exceptionally well and stops there.
