FortifyData Security Ratings vs Perimeter VRM Monitor: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

FortifyData Security Ratings

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing sprawling vendor ecosystems will get the most from FortifyData Security Ratings because its weekly asset discovery updates catch new third-party relationships before risk assessment cycles even start. The platform maps to NIST GV.SC and ID.AM by design, automatically surfacing in-scope vendors and their attack surface without manual questionnaire overhead. Skip this if your primary need is incident response orchestration or if you're already embedded in a point solution that does vendor risk adequately; FortifyData's strength is breadth of third-party visibility, not depth in any single risk domain.

Perimeter VRM Monitor

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing vendor sprawl will get real value from Perimeter VRM Monitor because it surfaces attack surface changes your vendors themselves don't know about yet, not just scoring what they tell you. The tool maps four distinct security domains,data, domain reputation, email, network,and correlates that external data against vendor self-assessments, catching the gaps where vendors are blind to their own exposure. Skip this if you need deep technical due diligence questionnaires or industry-specific compliance validation; Perimeter is strongest on continuous monitoring and early warning, lighter on the investigative depth required for high-risk third parties in regulated industries.