Living Security Human Risk Management vs Mimecast Engage: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Living Security Human Risk Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing click rates and re-trained users will see immediate lift from Living Security Human Risk Management because it scores and re-scores individual users in real time rather than treating awareness as an annual checkbox. The platform's behavioral intervention automation directly addresses NIST PR.AT and DE.CM by closing the gap between awareness training completion and actual risk reduction on the network. Skip this if your organization lacks the staffing to act on user-level risk signals or if you need a tool that doubles as your primary detection layer; Living Security is deliberately focused on behavior change, not threat detection.

Mimecast Engage

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing clicks will see immediate ROI from Mimecast Engage because it identifies and retrains your highest-risk employees in real time rather than waiting for annual training cycles. The platform covers PR.AT and ID.RA across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning it closes gaps in both awareness delivery and the risk assessment that should drive who gets trained first. Skip this if your organization has already solved employee behavior through other means or if you need detection and response capabilities; Mimecast Engage is purely behavioral training, not threat hunting.