Ghost Security Exorcist vs RandomLib: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Ghost Security Exorcist is a commercial static application security testing tool by Ghost Security. RandomLib is a free static application security testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best static application security testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Development teams shipping APIs without visibility into their own endpoints will find Ghost Security Exorcist's automated discovery and inventory actually useful, particularly for catching undocumented or shadow APIs before they become vulnerabilities. The AI-driven BOLA and deserialization detection works across five languages with line-level remediation guidance, and daily differential scanning in CI/CD means you're not waiting for quarterly assessments. Skip this if you need a platform covering infrastructure scanning or runtime protection; Exorcist is narrowly focused on code and API risk, which is exactly why it works well for teams that have that specific problem.
Developers embedding cryptographic operations into applications need RandomLib for its lightweight, dependency-free random number generation that actually meets security strength requirements without bloating build artifacts. The 841 GitHub stars reflect adoption by teams that have tested it against NIST SP 800-90B standards for entropy quality. Skip this if you're looking for a secrets management platform or key rotation service; RandomLib is a primitive, not a system, and it assumes you know where randomness belongs in your threat model.
