What is the difference between Filigran OpenCTI vs Lunar?

**Filigran OpenCTI**: Open-source threat intelligence platform for organizing and operationalizing CTI. built by Filigran. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include STIX 2.1 data model for threat intelligence structuring, Knowledge hypergraph with visual graphs and timelines, MITRE ATT&CK framework mapping.. **Lunar**: Free breach monitoring platform for compromised credential detection & alerting. built by Webz.io. headquartered in Israel. Core capabilities include Compromised credentials monitoring from breach dumps and infostealer logs, Stolen session cookie and access token intelligence, Forensic context including malware paths, hardware IDs, and malware families.. Both serve the Threat Intelligence Platforms market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

What features do Filigran OpenCTI vs Lunar offer?

**Filigran OpenCTI** differentiates with STIX 2.1 data model for threat intelligence structuring, Knowledge hypergraph with visual graphs and timelines, MITRE ATT&CK framework mapping. **Lunar** differentiates with Compromised credentials monitoring from breach dumps and infostealer logs, Stolen session cookie and access token intelligence, Forensic context including malware paths, hardware IDs, and malware families.

Who makes Filigran OpenCTI vs Lunar?

**Filigran OpenCTI** is developed by Filigran. **Lunar** is developed by Webz.io founded in 2015-01-01T00:00:00.000Z. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Filigran OpenCTI a good alternative to Lunar?

Filigran OpenCTI and Lunar serve similar Threat Intelligence Platforms use cases: both are Threat Intelligence Platforms tools, both cover Cyber Threat Intelligence. Key differences: Filigran OpenCTI is Commercial while Lunar is Free. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.